July 12, 2005


yes, it is (tina mcclelland). soft porn for aesthetes? one part Cindy Sherman, one part Natasha Merritt, one part nothing at all? my sort of aesthetics, though: all surface, indirection, combination, evocation, manipulation (in all senses of the word), self-portraits that give nothing away... (it's all in the raw material; as with Natasha Merritt it's pointless asking whether she actually exists). way too much of me in there -- somewhere.

(as always, god save us from those who'd label this "transgressive" -- this is commercial art, all light and allure...).


Post a Comment

<< Home

www Tight Sainthood