July 12, 2005

itsalwaysthequietones

yes, it is (tina mcclelland). soft porn for aesthetes? one part Cindy Sherman, one part Natasha Merritt, one part nothing at all? my sort of aesthetics, though: all surface, indirection, combination, evocation, manipulation (in all senses of the word), self-portraits that give nothing away... (it's all in the raw material; as with Natasha Merritt it's pointless asking whether she actually exists). way too much of me in there -- somewhere.

(as always, god save us from those who'd label this "transgressive" -- this is commercial art, all light and allure...).

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Google
www Tight Sainthood